>From a registry expert POV - > On 1 Apr 2022, at 2:47 am, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We were discussing the /.well-known/cmp that is in being proposed in > draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates, > We were comparing it to /.well-known/brski and /.well-known/est. > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml#well-known-uris-1 > > BRSKI has a sub-registry at: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/brski-parameters/brski-parameters.xhtml#brski-well-known-uris > > Question 1) > Why isn't the sub-registry referenced in the /.well-known registry? > It seems like the sub-registry should be linked in the related > information.
Because they didn't ask for it, I imagine. Does seem like a good idea if that's the case. > Question 2) > Should the CMP document be establishing a registry or not? Completely up to you -- how you manage the name spec "under" your registration depends on the application at hand. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
