Thanks, Tim, but i don't see rfc8552 updating or even mentioning rfc6763,
so i do not understand how it would be applicable to DNS-SD
Cheers
Toerless
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 07:44:51PM -0400, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:31 PM Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Oops, sorry, yes, the service names use -, the . is the coap level
> > discovery naming.
> > No idea yet, whether there is an actual need for that difference (still
> > getting up to
> > speed with coap).
> >
> >
> Also the current best practice is to deploy these type of TXT records using
> its
> own node name, as suggested in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8552
>
> tim
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
