Hi Spencer,
thanks for your kind words.
Indeed the answer is no. (at least for the coming 20 years).
Greetings and thanks,
Peter
Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker schreef op 2022-05-17 01:09:
Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins
Review result: Ready
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review
team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were
written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the
document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to
the IETF
discussion list for information.
When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider
this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
[email protected] if you reply to or forward this review.
This is a well-written specification. My only question - and I expect
the
answer will be "no" - is whether there is any concern that sizes of the
resources that are being passed around might exceed the MTU between the
pledge
and the registrar, and whether there should be a mention of this
possibility in
the specification.
Best,
Spencer
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
