Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not in favor of the YANG-CBOR draft defining special encodings for > 1 derived type (like date-and-time). Implementations may not store the > named YANG typedefs defined in various YANG modules. > The current draft (properly) addresses only the base types, not derived > types.
So, do you think that auxiliary drafts could/should be written to deal with special encoding of derived times? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
