On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 12:17 PM Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29. Jun 2022, at 19:10, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The sender and receiver need to agree on the encoding of each schema > item. > > There can be no guessing. But maybe this is a protocol issue and can be > addressed there. > > Yes. E.g, the constrained-voucher spec could define a new media type, > ZANG-data+CBOR, which is defined to be almost identical to YANG-data+CBOR, > except that in a few places (small matter of defining this properly, e.g., > based on SIDs) the encoding deviates. > > There will be more optimizations that will be added over time. Would it be possible to use a media-type parameter to identify each of the almost-identical variants? I new media type for each variant seems like too much cut-and-paste. > Grüße, Carsten > Andy
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
