Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > I need to understand epochs a bit better. I wonder whether an epoch > boundary should define when session-id repetition becomes OK (even if > highly improbable). There's a practical argument for that: a good > implementation will cache obsolete session-ids to detect repetition, > but needs to age out that cache somehow. My code does that with a > simple LRU but that isn't ideal.
That's totally a good idea. is: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rats-architecture-21.html#name-example-3-epoch-id-based-pa helpful? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
