Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can we make sure that the text does explain why the field is not
> inclueded, and explain that the packet MUST be rejected if it was
> included ?
Why should we reject if it is included?
> Seems like:
> Field is not included and would cause rejection of the packet if it was
> present, because it is inappropriate for the initiator to choose the
> next hop after the proxy not only because the Pledge would not know it,
> but because it is also not appropriate for security purposes for the
> Pledge to choose it.
> Do i correctly understand this ?
I don't think it's about the initiator choosing the next proxy.
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
