Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Martin Björklund <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is important to know, as the intention with the augmentation was > >> to extend the voucher with additional values as you did in the example > >> above. > > > Ok. Just to be clear; this is not what is defined today. In order to > > get this, 8366bis would have to use sx:structure, and then an 8995bis > > would have to use sx:augment-structure. > > But, I think that sx:augment-structure, if done by "B", and then done in a > different document by "C" would result in duplicate data nodes if "D" were to > import both.
No I don't think so, but perhaps I don't understand. Could you show an example of this situation? /martin _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
