Dear Matthias, all Thank you for your review and the proposals on making the draft more readable. I will go ahead an incorporate as much as possible from your suggestions to submit an update before the deadline on Monday. I will keep track on commenting by using the ANIMA github: [1] https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/pull/85<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fanima-wg%2Fanima-brski-prm%2Fpull%2F85&data=05%7C01%7Csteffen.fries%40siemens.com%7Cc83c4601b1fa4f9657c208db1ff26a9a%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C638138898257051084%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ycUBiF7C38S7Q6IopJdgFpBKkTaSVkp%2Ft%2Fr3fdEkt0Q%3D&reserved=0> [2] https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/tree/shepherd-review<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fanima-wg%2Fanima-brski-prm%2Ftree%2Fshepherd-review&data=05%7C01%7Csteffen.fries%40siemens.com%7Cc83c4601b1fa4f9657c208db1ff26a9a%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C638138898257051084%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=boajv5dIBD5xJb4bO36OjylqgwVndHk5T27Nrz3Dsqk%3D&reserved=0>
BTW, I'm still working on Toerless feedback and see if more issues need to be created. For the main issues raised, there are already issues created with respective proposals: #79 discovery of registrar with BRSKI-PRM function set<https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/issues/79> #80 pledge discovery using GRASP?<https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/issues/80> #81 Additional text to explain usage of agent-signed data <https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/issues/81> #82 Include text related to TLS library issues<https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/issues/82> #83 Clarify re-enrollment support in BRSKI-PRM<https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/issues/83> #84 use of registrar endpoints for responder vs. initiator mode<https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/issues/84> Best regards Steffen From: Matthias Kovatsch <[email protected]> Sent: Mittwoch, 8. März 2023 17:30 To: anima <[email protected]>; anima-chairs <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm <[email protected]> Subject: Shepherd review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm Dear Anima WG, co-chairs, and authors I started my shepherd review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm. I currently see the need for some restructuring to make the draft clearer to the reader and easier to implement. Hence my review is done as work-in-progress pull request in the GitHub repo of the draft [1]. Comments by Toerless have been captured as issues by the draft authors and will be resolved after the pull request is merged; where possible, they can be addressed in iterations going into the shepherd-review branch [2]. Best wishes, Matthias [1] https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/pull/85<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fanima-wg%2Fanima-brski-prm%2Fpull%2F85&data=05%7C01%7Csteffen.fries%40siemens.com%7Cc83c4601b1fa4f9657c208db1ff26a9a%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C638138898257051084%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ycUBiF7C38S7Q6IopJdgFpBKkTaSVkp%2Ft%2Fr3fdEkt0Q%3D&reserved=0> [2] https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/tree/shepherd-review<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fanima-wg%2Fanima-brski-prm%2Ftree%2Fshepherd-review&data=05%7C01%7Csteffen.fries%40siemens.com%7Cc83c4601b1fa4f9657c208db1ff26a9a%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C638138898257051084%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=boajv5dIBD5xJb4bO36OjylqgwVndHk5T27Nrz3Dsqk%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
