On 13/03/2023, 18:10, "Thomas Fossati" [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 5:49 PM Michael Richardson > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > > Thomas Fossati [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have commented on your respective issue trackers. > > > > I saw, but I think that this requires some cross-WG discussion and > > consensus, > > and I think that the COSE WG should tell us what to do. > > Sure, thank you for bringing COSE in the loop.
I just realised this needed some follow-up from my side. What MCR is talking about is the eat-media-type [1] draft we are doing in RATS. The document requests registration of the +cwt structured syntax suffix (see Section 6.1). The idea is to use +cwt to indicate that the media type is encoded as a CWT, symmetric to +jwt. In our case we'd be using it in composition with application/eat to differentiate between the JWT and CWT serialisations of EAT. COSE is the natural stakeholders for this, so if you could have a look and see if we are doing the right thing it'd be awesome. cheers, thanks! [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-eat-media-type/ IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
