Laurence Lundblade <[email protected]> wrote: > I’m not sure identifying something as COSE, or even CWT is that useful > because there’s no standard for the key material and key identification > that cuts across all uses of COSE or CWT.
Knowing that it's COSE, a dissector can know: 1) it's an array with four elements. 2) the [3] element is a signature. 3) the [0] element contains parameters 4) the [1] element is a protected hash 5) the [2] element is a bstr with cbor inside it. Of course, the 18() also tells you that :-) To know what keys, you need to know that it's EAT, and some additional context. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
