Hi Toerless, all, As requested yesterday I've created Github issues for the WGLC review comments on BRSKI-cloud (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-05). See https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues.
I added Brian's multiple WGLC comments as a single issue placeholder; if needed these can be split in parts. Due to our recent work on RFC8366-bis a new issue also emerged, whether the YANG extensions of BRSKI-cloud should be moved to RFC8366-bis, to avoid the YANG related issues of extension/augmentation that we've discussed recently. I think this would be best to move. The issue is recorded as : https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/34 Regards Esko IoTconsultancy.nl | Email/Teams: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | +31 6 2385 8339
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
