Forget the result label, again. Resend it with the right label in email title.
Regards, -------------- Sheng Jiang >Hi, all, > >We received no negative response to the WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-04 >during the two-week WGLC and we did receive good reviews through the WG >document stage (started from July 2020, as >draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll) and WGLC period. Considering the past >history of this work, I, with my ANIMA chair cap on, feel it has passed the >WGLC and should be advanced. Toerless Eckert is the assigned document shepherd. > >Up to now, there is no IPR disclosure to this document. > >Best regards, > >Sheng > > > >>Dear ANIMAers, > > > >> > > > >>This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to advance >>draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-04, which defines an enhancement of Bootstrapping >>Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI, RFC 8995) that supports alternative >>certificate enrollment protocols. > > > >> > > > >>This document's intended status is Standards Track. At present, there is no >>IPR filed against this document. This document has been ANIMA WG document >>since July, 2020 (with name draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll at that time. >>It renamed after 5 updates April 2022.) and has received a lot of feedback >>from the WG and work from its authors. The authors therefore think is ready >>for WGLC. Please send your comments by April 3rd 2023. If you do not feel >>this document should advance, please state your reasons why. Toerless Eckert >>is the assigned document shepherd. > > > >> > > > >>Regards, > > > >> > > > >>Sheng for the chairs > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>_______________________________________________ > > > >>Anima mailing list > > > >>[email protected] > > > >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
