Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > 2. I would suggest to move RFC7030 to normative references. This would make > it consistent with lightweight CMP references also being normative, and given > how the endpoint naming scheme is derived and meant to be backward compatible with > EST, and EST being explicitly mentioned several times in that context..
Do people implementing the CMP-AE need to know what EST is in detail? That doesn't jive with me. I think it can stay informative, but it's really a quibble. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
