RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> Notes
> -----
> The second paragraph in the original text appears to be a more
> carefully-written version of the first paragraph. Therefore the first
> paragraph should be deleted and the second paragraph retained.
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to
> change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
Sure, it's an improvement.
It seems entirely editorial, so "Hold for Document Update"
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
