On 26-Jul-23 09:06, Michael Richardson wrote: > Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That makes sense, but it probably needs to be normatively specified, > > which would avoid any need to change RFC 8995, except perhaps an > > erratum to delete that "(list of)" wart. > I didn't get the "(list of)" wart...
bc> objective-value = text ; name of the (list of) supported
bc> ; protocols: "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
so, errata I think.
I think it should now say:
objective-value = text ; name of the supported protocols.
; e.g., "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
