> I believe it's better for everybody if this is done by the authors. But the authors may not see the relevant issues. Only a picky reviewer might see them ;-) Ideally there should be more than 1 WG reviewer that reads everything in detail to find the nits.
-----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 22:40 To: Esko Dijk <[email protected]>; Toerless Eckert <[email protected]>; Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Anima] Esko: Re: Moving draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-06 forward > (we can apply the lazy-fix policy and let IESG find them ;-) ) A bit off topic, but that is *not* the IESG's job. Unfortunately the IESG often wastes time on this rather than sending it on to the RFC Editor, whose job it is. I believe it's better for everybody if this is done by the authors. Regards Brian On 10-Aug-23 03:33, Esko Dijk wrote: > I did check just now - the review comments were addressed. I added a few new > text issues in the issue tracker #42 to #46 > (https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues) and a request to change one > more item for #32. > This is based on reading the new text and re-reading the old. These are > things I feel that the WG needs to fix before proceeding with the document, > to avoid reviewer's confusion further down the line. > > Overall, I also found there's still many typos and word omissions that could > be fixed before moving this document forward to IESG. Not sure if that's > needed (we can apply the lazy-fix policy and let IESG find them ;-) ) > I could also send a PR with fixes but that might delay the process. Let me > know if this PR is desired or not! > > Esko > > -----Original Message----- > From: Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 19:50 > To: Esko Dijk <[email protected]> > Cc: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Esko: Re: [Anima] Moving draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-06 forward > > Esko: I was just checking -07, it looks as if your open review concerns > should have been > successfully answered. Would you mind acknowledging, please ?! > > Thanks > Toerless > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:58:22PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >> Owen Friel \(ofriel\) <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Thanks Esko, I just merged a PR to address these: >> > https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/issues/40 Thanks, Owen >> >> now posted -07: >> >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-06&url2=draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-07&difftype=--html >> >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) >> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
