Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 5.2.2. GRASP discovery
>>
>> This section is normative for uses with an ANIMA ACP.
> So really, is there a natural scenario where constrained-join-proxy is
> used in a region of the network where an ANIMA ACP is established? And
> on balance, I have to extend the question to
> constrained-voucher. Certainly, GRASP was not designed for constrained
> nodes. There is no logic in using GRASP discovery for its own sake.
Yeah,
1) an ANIMA ACP where there are IoT gateways at the edge.
2) an network where it makes sense to use constrained (COSE/CBOR) vouchers
for routers rather JSON based ones. (Whether or not they run over CoAPS or
HTTPS)
> To me, the conclusion is fairly obvious. Possibly the GRASP work done
> in both drafts should be combined into a new draft, if you can describe
> a scenario where constrained nodes participate in a full ANIMA ACP.
I'm fine with that, but then let's get it done already.
Code is waiting.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
