Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> wrote: > I wanted to check the WG status of this document. > draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-09 has been put on the publication > requested queue but seems to have a fairly strong dependency on > draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis, and hence I am wondering whether it > doesn’t make more sense to wait for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis to also > be in the Pub Req queue before progressing them both together?
You are right. As do all the other documents in WGLC! There are some editorial reviews with many outstanding issues (24). It's on me to finish this, and I seem to be developing the cycles to do that. We did somewhat intentionally leave this document open in the event that WGLC on other documents would reveal text that ought to have been in rfc8366bis. So, you are completely correct that we have to get them all done. We knew, a year ago, that it would become a cluster of dependancy cycles. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
