Hi Sheng, Toerless, I'm happy that we took discovery as single topic out of the related drafts to address it once and use it in the different other drafts you listed. That said yes, I think it addresses a valid problem and is needed.
Bet regards Steffen > -----Original Message----- > From: Anima <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sheng JIANG > Sent: Friday, February 9, 2024 9:29 AM > To: anima <[email protected]> > Cc: anima-chairs <[email protected]>; rwilton <[email protected]> > Subject: [Anima] Adoption call on draft-eckert-anima-brski-discovery-01 by > 2024/2/23rd > > Hi, ANIMAers, > > This email starts a two-week adoption call on draft-eckert-anima-brski- > discovery-01. It ends by 2024/2/23rd. > > This draft is not new as normal -01 individual draft. It is coalesced from the > discovery options parts of several ANIMA WG documents: > > draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm > draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae > draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-voucher > draft-ietf-anima-brski-constrained-proxy > > > It has been introduced and discussed during the Prague meeting. Hence, the > ANIMA chairs think it has a reasonable good foundation for adoption. Please > express your opinions on whether this document is meaningful for our ANIMA > WG by the ending time 2024/2/23rd. The writing quality of this document is a > late consideration after WG adoption. > > Regards, > > > Sheng JIANG > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww > .ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fanima&data=05%7C02%7Csteffen.fries% > 40siemens.com%7C4c8a383ffd924c5dc71908dc2949352d%7C38ae3bcd95 > 794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C638430641603141748%7CUnkn > own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik > 1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=TCfrjDrg%2FMTT5NFV > bMEGTsq6jO1TBDK0IUOic44cwMc%3D&reserved=0 _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
