On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 12:22:19PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> Hi Toerless,
>
> I am catching up on this thread and the document, so pardon me if I missed
> something.
>
> I notice that draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-09 has had no reviews outside of
> the WG, e.g. SECDIR/HTTPDIR/YANGDOCTORS etc. Is there a reason? Before I can
> pick up the draft, can we have some of these reviews done?
This document is primarily meant to be used for BRSKI PRM (*), which itself
successfully passed SECDIR, YANGDOCTORS and IOTDIR, so those three teams
had seen JWS voucher and agreed on its use for BRSKI PRM. Given how little
functionality there is specified in JWS itself, and given how we had exhaustive
discuss with those three teams, we felt it wasn' worth the duplication of
process.
But if you disagree, i am happy to trigger appropriate requests.
Btw: also remember all the discuss' we had around media-type registration,
which i think
is the one core aspect of JWS voucher, and i think we also resolved those
media-type
question the latest at IETF119.
(*) and of course we started it out as a separate document to make it easy to
be reused/referenced by any other BRSKI use-case that does not care about the
BRSKI-PRM
specifics. And with the desire to avoid unnecessary libraries (like CMS), this
may actually be very useful.
> I provided some review comments as a individual contributor, but did not
> receive any responses. I also notice a few TODOs in the document. Is this
> document really ready?
See the other reply i jusst sent. The TODO where solely about the editorial
questions of how to name the relationship of this doc to the other docs,
and i hope our choices in whats to be -10 will not be contested in the
IETF reviews.
Btw: i still see JWS voucher in Robs queue (action holder), i think you would
want to fix this to yourself so that you can better control progressing it.
Thanks a lot!
Toerless
>
> > On Jan 9, 2024, at 8:38 AM, Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > FYI:
> >
> > We have passed JWS on to IESG for review after the authors confirmed to us
> > that the document(s)
> > depending on JWS voucher, predominantly BRSKI-PRM is now in a state where
> > we are sure that
> > no further fixes on the JWS voucher document is required. JWS voucher
> > itself went through all
> > the WG work including Matthias' Kovatsch Shepherd review last year already,
> > and we did
> > only held it back in case our ongoing work on BRSKI-PRM would require any
> > changes.
> >
> > Thanks a lot folks for the progress we're starting to make, exiting
> > documents from WG stage!
> >
> > Cheers
> > Toerless (for the chairs)
> >
>
>
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
