Hi, Toerless, I think the action of asking for IANA early review should only be done when the document was getting into the late stage of WG document, like in WGLC or close to WGLC. This document has just been adapted last IETF and submitted as a WG document first time in this April. It even has not be presented as a WG document for once. I think it is too early to take this action. Bottom line, I would like to hear the WG response in IETF 120.
Regards, Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On > Behalf Of 'Toerless Eckert' > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 9:26 AM > To: Sheng JIANG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [Anima] Sheng: Early IANA review for > draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03 please > > Dear Sheng, > > (author hat on): > > It would be great if you (chair hat on) could ask for IANA early review of > draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03. The IANA section is requesting three > tables > in on subsection of a registry (BRSKI), which i haven't seen done in before, > so i > was wondering what IANA thinks about that. There is a note in the section for > IANA about this as well. > > Thanks a lot > Toerless > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
