Hi, Toerless, I (with my chair-hat on) approve this Early Allocation with IANA. I will make the request to Mahesh soon.
Regards, Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 'Toerless Eckert' > Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2024 12:45 AM > To: Sheng JIANG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Sheng: early allocation request please > > Hi Sheng > > Can you please approve and request (according to RFC7120) the following > Early Allocation with IANA: > (aka: get approval from Mahesh, forward to IANA). > > 1. Registry: "IETF YANG SID Range" - > https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-sid/yang-sid.xhtml > > 2. Requested registry entries: > > Entry Point Size Module Name Reference > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 2450 50 ietf-voucher > I-D.ietf-anima-rfc8366bis > 2500 50 ietf-voucher-request > I-D.ietf-anima-rfc8366bis > > 3. Explanation > > These two entry points are currently listed in the registry with > a) obsolete Module Name > b) wrong reference > c) without yet having received an official Early allocation > > The SID definition was moved from I-D.ietf-anima-constrained-voucher > some time > into I-D.ietf-anima-rfc8366bis, and in that process the Module Names > where > changed. Early Allocations are now becoming necessary as the registry is > about to be initially finalized with its defining RFC (I-D.ietf-core-sid) being > in > RFC-editor/AUTH48. > > Justification/stability: the SID range definitions are in rfc8366bis since at > least > 2022 and are stable. > > 4. Contact: Toerless Eckert (co-author) > Sheng Jiang (WG chair) > > Thanks a lot! > Toerless (for the authors) _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
