On 21-Aug-24 04:24, Michael Richardson wrote:
Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> however: If we happen to progress brski-discovery roughly as quickly as
(some of)
> the BRSKI drafts, and they end up being in the RFC editor queue at the
same time,
> MichaelR told me that even those informative reference would be upgrade
to the
> RFC number, sometimes even assigning the RFC numbers before those RFC
are officially
> released.
That would only happen if the discovery document lapped the brski-prm
document, which I would think would not happen, because it would normatively
reference in the other direction.
> And maybe one could force this by asking those RFC to be cluseted to
> achieve this.
That's what a cluster is.
Yes, and that's a choice we could make; I only gave my opinion.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
