> So where do we do this cleanup? > Can it occur in cBRSKI? Seems fine to me, as we're already making changes to the registry in cBRSKI. This would fit into that. I had opened an issue already on GitHub to do this: https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/326
Esko -----Original Message----- From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sent: dinsdag 25 februari 2025 20:24 To: Esko Dijk <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Anima] the RFC8995 BRSKI well-known URIs registry Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree with the change from "URI" to "Path Segment". So where do we do this cleanup? Can it occur in cBRSKI? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS* _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
