Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > I have some questions for the people who propose making TLS 1.3 a SHOULD for new protocols:
Our (ANIMA) document already has TLS 1.3 as a SHOULD (and the ancedent document from 2021 said the same thing). I was asked to make it a MUST, because uta-require-tls13. Vendors violate MUSTs all the time; customers can use RFCs as big hammers to insist. It really does happen. But, MUST do TLS 1.3 implies (to me), do *NOT* (refuse to) do TLS 1.2. The only way to allow (MAY) TLS 1.2, is for TLS 1.3 to be SHOULD. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
