Hello David,
Thank you for the comment. Yes, it is certainly good to additionally define the
domain registrar in the terminology section. The following has been included:
NEW
domain registrar: An entity in the customer domain, which
facilitates the interaction of a pledge or Registrar-Agent with a
manufacturer service (MASA). It operates as BRSKI-EST server for
the pledge when requesting vouchers and certificates and acts as
the client BRSKI-MASA client when requesting vouchers from the
MASA. This component was introduced in [RFC8995].
I will put an updated version on the ANIMA git. The changes are visible via the
diff:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm&url_2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/refs/heads/main/draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm.txt
I will wait with a new submission if further comments need to be addressed.
Best regards
Steffen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lawrence via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 12:21 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-19
>
> Document: draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm
> Title: BRSKI with Pledge in Responder Mode (BRSKI-PRM)
> Reviewer: David Lawrence
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I previously reviewed -17 with only two minor issues, one about "Domain
> Registrar"
> and the other about the IANA instructions.
>
> Thank you for fixing up the IANA instructions.
>
> On the issue of "Domain Registrar" and more broadly on the very frequent usage
> of "domain" itself, I still think it would be useful if the Terminology
> section called
> out these terms. While "domain" is obviously a general term, many of us will
> have
> a cognitive bias toward thinking that this is somehow related to the domain
> names
> in the DNS. This is especially relevant with the term "Domain Registrar",
> and it was
> initially mental overhead for me on my first read on the document.
>
> I don't think you have to spend a lot of words on the matter, but I still
> think it would
> be an improvement to have Terminology define "Domain" and "Domain Registrar"
> as they apply to the document. "Domain" is defined in RFC 8995, referenced,
> but
> "Domain Registrar" is not.
>
> That said, I don't think this is a substantial enough comment to further hold
> up
> what is otherwise a solid document. But if you're doing to rev a -20 for any
> other
> reasons ...
>
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
