On 01-Jul-25 14:50, Toerless Eckert wrote:
Was wondering: If we are writing explicit requirements into the BRSKI
considerations documents, should they not rather be BCP instead of
informational ? I must admit i am completely confused about when to
choose BCP versus informational when you do use RFC2119 language.
I am noting that RFC8504 is BCP whereas RFC 1122 is Standard.
I guess BCP is now preferred over standards track when it comes
to requirements which are really more of a profile than a protocol,
but that's as far as my guessing goes.
I think that's correct, but whatever you choose, at least one Last
Call reviewer will disagree :-). In any case, it's easier to include
the BCP14 language now than to retrofit it later.
Brian
Any better insight ?
Cheers
Toerless
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
