Yes, that idea came up a lot already.
The reason we haven’t acted on that is that higher option numbers sort later,
so there is some work to be done to get the components of the URI in order.
Apart from that: Uri-Patj(".well-known”) as a CoAP Option would save 10+ bytes
on each use, so indeed let’s go ahead and do that.
If support for this new critical option is required for some interesting
protocol, it might get deployment.
Unfortunately, you won’t be able to do this casually in other contexts.
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
