Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like we should consider this direction. What about "me.arpa" ?
sa.me.arpa ;_0
> Additional benefits in cBRSKI context are:
> 1. For sender of Link Format: not having to encode the IPv6 LL address in
> UTF-8 format.
> 2. For receiver: not having to, or accidentally trying to, parse the IPv6
LL
> address from UTF-8 format.
> 3. Avoid duplicate information in two different encodings which might
lead to
> unexpected bugs (e.g. due to implementations using the different version
of
> the information).
Agreed.
Would like to hear from some CoAP gurus now.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
