Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the summary! Agree to add that as explanatory note. We could add > in that note very explicitly "8995 does make it mandatory to include in the > Voucher Request, by the wording "is included", whereas 8366 describes it is > optionally included in the Voucher."
> This was a point I had previously missed. Because the Registrar doesn't
know
> whether the MASA needs to see idevid-issuer or not, the only option it
has is
> to include it.
If the Pledge included idevid-issuer in the voucher request (PVR), then the
Registrar probably SHOULD^WMUST include it in the Registrar Voucher Request
(RVR).
Probably an "if X then MUST"
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
