Dear colleagues,
The Number Resource Organization Number Council* (NRO NC) has completed its
qualitative analysis and summary of the community responses received to the
questionnaire on the proposed principles to update ICP-2
<https://www.nro.net/policy/internet-coordination-policy-2/proposed-icp-2-version-2-principles/>.
The questionnaire was open from 8 October until 6 December 2024. During this
window, we received 298 individual submissions from the Regional Internet
Registry (RIR) communities. The summary and the raw data questionnaire are
available here
<https://www.nro.net/policy/internet-coordination-policy-2/icp-2-principles-questionnaire-report-and-data/>.
This summary
<https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/ICP-2-Questionnaire-Summary-Report.pdf>
provides an overview of the input received, first and foremost, to support the
drafting of the updated ICP-2 document, and secondly, to report back to the RIR
communities. Thirdly, the feedback provides important insights that will be
valuable for the future implementation of the updated version of ICP-2.
The summary does not include the NRO NC’s opinions on or responses to the
comments submitted, nor does it include an evaluation of the communities’
opinion on the principles. The NRO NC will continue to discuss the communities’
feedback as well as the input received through ICANN’s public comment
<https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-internet-coordination-policy-2-icp-2-version-2-principles-08-10-2024>
while drafting the updated ICP-2 document.
For each proposed principle, respondents could express their level of agreement
through a five-point opinion scale (Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree,
or Strongly Disagree) and provide comments. Additionally, they could share
general feedback at the end of the questionnaire.
It was noted in reviewing the responses that approximately half were found to
be duplicate comments. The duplicate responses were consolidated and considered
as a single input. It is important to note that these near-identical responses
have also been included in this analysis. We have provided more details on how
these responses were identified and treated in the Methodology section of the
summary and the PDF containing the text of the comments.
Further, many responses provided a rating that did not match the content of the
response. In these cases, we prioritised the content of the response, rather
than using the rating. For the purposes of transparency, the full datasets with
the duplicate responses, as well as a filtered dataset without duplicate
answers are available in both PDF and CSV formats. We encourage you to browse
through the actual data along with reading our summary.
We sincerely thank everyone who has shared their insights. It was a long
questionnaire, and we appreciate the time, thought and effort put in by our
respondents.*The Number Resource Organization Number Council (NRO NC) is also
known as the Address Supporting Organization Address Council (ASO AC) within
ICANN, where it serves as the body responsible for overseeing global policy
development related to Internet number resources.
On behalf of the NRO NC
_______________________________________________
Announce mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
