Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 11/28/2000 12:15 AM, "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My point (you can make that your data point 2 Jon) is that right >> now I'll have to remove junit.jar every time I've done a cvs update >> (or install a separate version of Ant) if I want to participate in >> JUnit development - just to be sure the "right" JUnit classes get >> picked up when I build a development version of JUnit using Ant. > > Huh? That isn't true at all. Ant is self contained.
My problem is not using Ant or using JUnit, it is compiling JUnit. <javac> includes the System CLASSPATH, which again contains JUnit 3.2 unless I remove it. Stefan
