Diane Holt wrote: > Actually, I believe the contention was that the order in which you specify > targets in the "depends" attribute wasn't being respected, and that > instead, the targets listed in the "depends" attribute were executed > according to the order in which those targets appeared in the build-file.
Hmm... thats not the way I read it, but no biggie. :-) In either case, the assertion made in the bug report seems to be false. Glenn McAllister
