From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > When it is a container task or a dynamic one like proposed for
> > property. ie
> >
> > <if test="...">
> > <some-other-task/>
> > </fi>
>
> I still don't get it, sorry. Somehow If.createTask("some-other-task")
> or similar would have been called anyway, wouldn't it?
Unless a brainfart is getting to me, then the current API would do
Task taskIf = new IfTask() ;
taskIf.createSomeOtherTask() ;
which is not what you want.
The proposed "give the task access to the model" solution is one way
of solving that. (It's not the only one though).
I'm not sure if that's what Peter was getting at though.
