Late? Man are you late! ;-) I also wasn't 100% with the name. My original intent was to call it <log>, but I was afraid that people might mistake it as the controls for the logging functionality provided at the command line. If we're going to banter the name around, what's the preference: recorder, record or log?
Jay > -----Original Message----- > From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:33 AM > To: ant-dev > Subject: Re: [SUBMIT] resubmit of <recorder> with small changes > > > Sorry to come to the party late on the <recorder> task. I > like it but my > only minor nit would be to call it <record>. In general I see tasks as > verbs and datatypes as nouns. Not a big deal, of course :-) > > Conor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:53 PM > Subject: Re: [SUBMIT] resubmit of <recorder> with small changes > > > > Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > cvs 1.10.7 for Linux that is - I now realize, there is a > 1.11, I'll > > > retry. > > > > No difference. > > > > Stefan > > > >
