--- Jay Glanville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also wasn't 100% with the name. My original intent was to call it
> <log>, but I was afraid that people might mistake it as the controls
> for the logging functionality provided at the command line. If we're
> going to banter the name around, what's the preference: recorder, record
> or log?
Actually, I'd prefer <transcribe> ("to make a written copy of") -- and it
avoids the "Is it re-cord or rec-ord?" issue. :)
But I'm +1 on it, whatever you want to call it.
Diane
=====
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
