----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Vernum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'ANT-dev'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:15 PM Subject: RE: Vetoed point??
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> -------------------------------------------------------------- * It > > >> should be possible to modify details of the actual build > > >> (e.g. classpath, used compiler) without the need to change > > the build > > >> specification. > > > I just though it odd as he seemed to be for the notion of > > aspects which > > this point was directly related to ;) > > Well the point doesn't mention aspects. > I guess it implied using aspects to you, but it certainly didn't to me. > No, it didn't. I'm still thinking about aspects, but I wouldn't have thought that controlling the compiler was a candidate use. Pete, why don't you spell out exactly what you mean so that we can understand what are the implications. Conor
