At 12:13 10/5/01 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: >No, it didn't. I'm still thinking about aspects, but I wouldn't have >thought that controlling the compiler was a candidate use. Pete, why don't >you spell out exactly what you mean so that we can understand what are the >implications.
Aspects are an implementation strategy and I was told not to discuss them in requirements phase. Compiler control is not likely to be aspect driven though - it will probably be part of preferences - whether it is css/xml/properties/other. Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
