Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:14, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > My main concerns was that this would allow dependency tree to be >> > modified. >> >> It does not - as the expansion happens at parser time. > > Okay then - dynamically specified on the command line if that makes > it sound better.
Not better, but clearer 8-) > Either way comments still apply ;) So you say you are going to -1 every solution that allows users to specify dependencies on the command line for Ant2 and offer templates as the alternative. You'd accept such a non-templating solution for Ant1, as long as it doesn't imply it will be present in Ant2. Is this correct? Stefan
