On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:52, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:14, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > My main concerns was that this would allow dependency tree to be > >> > modified. > >> > >> It does not - as the expansion happens at parser time. > > > > Okay then - dynamically specified on the command line if that makes > > it sound better. > > Not better, but clearer 8-) > > > Either way comments still apply ;) > > So you say you are going to -1 every solution that allows users to > specify dependencies on the command line for Ant2 and offer templates > as the alternative. You'd accept such a non-templating solution for > Ant1, as long as it doesn't imply it will be present in Ant2. Is this > correct?
essentially ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------*
