From: "Stephane Bailliez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**************************************************** * Doctor: A person who kills your ills by pills, * * and then kills you with his bills. * **************************************************** > There is no point in exagerating patch support. > It's not like a mission critical app., and we > don't have to accept everything to make a kitchen > sink just to please everybody. If someone sent a > patch and that's a blocker, than she is using a > workaround or a patched version. If someone sent > a task then she is using that task already. That's > not because we make it in build v 02/02/2002 rather > than v1.5 final that it will change anything. > However it must be in 'final'. Clearly, we are coming from two different schools of thought here. IMHO, the earlier we commit the patches (the good ones only, of course), the more time we have it to be tested out. Patching things just before a release is too risky, I feel. Ideal time to be patching, is, as Pete once mentioned, right after a release. > > Stephane > Cheers, Magesh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
