On Tuesday 26 March 2002 18:25 pm, Diane wrote: > How about adding a reset() or resetPatterns(boolean includes, boolean > excludes) method on PatternSet, that Stephan can call explicitly!?!?! That > way's everybody's happy, and a PatternSet instance can be reused to match > something else? Haven't looked at any code, but it seems that would work > for Stephan... --DD
Sounds like a perfectly good solution for me... except that i cannot access the pattern set belonging to the MatchedTask/Zip/Jar tasks because there are no accessors for it (and it's not public/protected). What i was attempting was not something very many people are gonna try. The workarounds to make all that work would create more mess than it's worth.Erik's point about: � � <patternset id="patternset" includes="...."> � � � � <include name="..."/> � � </patternset> shows clearly why it needs to append rather than set. i was primary confused by the setter not setting, which is as much a doc bug as an implementation bug. ----- stephan Generic Unix Computer Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Office: +49 (89) �552 92 862 Handy: �+49 (179) 211 97 67 "...control is a degree of inhibition, and a system which is perfectly inhibited is completely frozen." -- Alan W. Watts -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
