On Tuesday 26 March 2002 18:59 pm, stephan beal wrote: > i was primary > confused by the setter not setting, which is as much a doc bug as an > implementation bug.
What i should have said was: it is a doc bug (or, even, a mis-use of the term 'set'). As Erik showed, it's not an implementation bug. ----- stephan Generic Unix Computer Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.einsurance.de Office: +49 (89) �552 92 862 Handy: �+49 (179) 211 97 67 "...control is a degree of inhibition, and a system which is perfectly inhibited is completely frozen." -- Alan W. Watts -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
