> Well, do you have a magic ball that tells you what's good > practice ? > > It seems there are at least few ant commiters who seem to believe > that targetless build files are usefull and convenient, and > a valid ( and good ) practice. I don't think we're stupid, and > the fact that we used ant for quite a bit of time and several > projects sugests we may not be completely clueless. > > I'm getting tired of this discussion. I don't know if someone is > counting the votes - probably we need another [VOTE] thread > with the 2 separate issues, top level tasks and targetless > builds. And the majority should decide - no need to repeat > arguments over and over.
Hey! It's what I think. I think it's bad. You think it's good. Maybe I'm wrong, if many ppl think it's good. It's just a technical debate. Ara. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
