On 23 Jul 2002, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > We've had six +1s and one -1 by the committers who did not abstain > (and Stephane's explicit 0).
> Comparing (a) to (b) the first argument is not valid IMHO, I cannot It doesn't matter. The decision to remove top-level tasks had few -1s ( mine included ), but it was a majority vote. The current rules for release and 'rule for revolutionary' imply that the majority can decide what features and code it wants ( instead of one individual making the decisions ) Peter can propose another vote if he wants - but until this happens I consider the subject closed, ant will support targetless build files. Costin > see how (b) is clearer than (a). Also I fail to see how the evolution > from (b) to good and modular build files may be easier than from (a). > > Peter, any other reasons? > > Stefan > > Footnotes: > [1] <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=102697745627127&w=2> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
