On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Peter can propose another vote if he wants - but until this happens >> I consider the subject closed, ant will support targetless build >> files. > > Actually Peter already did just that. It was vetoed ... much the > same way that target-less build files was vetoed. Stefan reverted > the change.
Huh? You are talking about making <project>'s default attribute default to "main" if omitted, yes? There has been no vote, Conor gave a -1 with a reason, the reason has been confirmed by Steve and you never responded. It seems the situation is a bit different. > It seems the rules change depending on who is doing the veto. It seems the rules change depending on who is interpreting them, yes, this it too true. I know you've been advocating over and over again that a -1 becomes invalid if all reasons have been addressed. I am playing by your rules. Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
