On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 19:58, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Peter can propose another vote if he wants - but until this happens > >> I consider the subject closed, ant will support targetless build > >> files. > > > > Actually Peter already did just that. It was vetoed ... much the > > same way that target-less build files was vetoed. Stefan reverted > > the change. > > Huh? You are talking about making <project>'s default attribute > default to "main" if omitted, yes?
yep. > There has been no vote, there was originally. > It seems the situation is a bit different. hmmmm ... yes, now it is Stefans change. > > It seems the rules change depending on who is doing the veto. > > It seems the rules change depending on who is interpreting them, yes, > this it too true. > > I know you've been advocating over and over again that a -1 becomes > invalid if all reasons have been addressed. I am playing by your > rules. You have not addressed my reasons at all. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -------------------------------- My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right -------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
