It still has methods from Object...
Mvgr,
Martin
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 19:43, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
> --- Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Listen guys, if we follow the analogy with Java
> > classes, what Peter says
> > make perfect sense.
> >
> > Having targetless buildfiles is like having
> > methodless classes with only
> > a static part... I don't know if it's possible in
> > java, but who would
> > ever use it?
> >
>
> public class Constants {
> public static final Wigget THE_WIGET;
> public static final Googedly GOOK;
>
> static {
> try {
> THE_WIGET = new Wigget();
> GOOK = new Googedly();
> }
> catch (Exception e) {
> System.out.println("Could not initialize");
> }
> }
> }
>
> Actually this is a quite useful pattern, which I have
> seen in many places.
>
> Jose Alberto
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
