Magesh Umasankar wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Listen guys, if we follow the analogy with Java classes, what Peter says > > make perfect sense. > > > Having targetless buildfiles is like having methodless classes with only > > a static part... I don't know if it's possible in java, but who would > > ever use it? > > It is very much possible in Java to have just > a static part and nothing else.
In fact a colleague of mine just ran into exactly this type of java file (written by someone else) in some code he is working with. Scary but there are people out there who do scary things! Gus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
